tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1006479003534298455.post5944287674161842836..comments2023-10-12T07:59:31.827-04:00Comments on Antiquitopia: Brown Watch: The Distancing BeginsJared Calawayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09380681998833566514noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1006479003534298455.post-39233172778631241792007-06-30T09:05:00.000-04:002007-06-30T09:05:00.000-04:00I was thinking about Barack when I posted, and he ...I was thinking about Barack when I posted, and he is the closest and his name has a nice alliterative quality to it with the B's as long as you don't include his middle name (Hussein)...but the trend is that the LAST name has to be a "B" and he would be an "O." He could technically break the trend, but remain close to it at the same time--sounds like a move a politician would make. But, if we take this more expansively, we could include Bill Clinton (not legally a "B" but a "W," but no one calls him William Clinton), and even back to George Bush I. But the buck stops with Reagan. <BR/><BR/>But if H. Clinton wins in 2008, it is a completely different analysis in which in the US only two families would have been President for a total of 24 years once she would have finished her 1st term in office. If she would have a second term, there would be a HUGE portion of the population that would not have been alive (or would have been too young to remember) anyone not named Bush or Clinton being President. Oh, the possibilities.Jared Calawayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09380681998833566514noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1006479003534298455.post-54350658052941412742007-06-30T00:22:00.000-04:002007-06-30T00:22:00.000-04:00Won't Barack Obama keep the B trend going? :)Won't Barack Obama keep the B trend going? :)Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13204688519029277334noreply@blogger.com