Posts

Showing posts with the label Ernst Bloch

Scaly Complexity

The serpent sets the tone--seductive but also rousing. In none of its appearances is its image simple. It bears poison within itself, but on the Aesculapian staff, healing. It is the dragon of the abyss, but, at another moment, the lightning high-above. And long after it is meant to have brought sorrow on our first parents, the sight of the serpent-idol held aloft heals the children of Israel from leprosy. Nor did it tell lies, as befitted the most cunning of all the beasts of the field, at least not in the most important point of its promise. For it promised Adam he would be like God; and when Yahweh saw him afterwards he said, "Behold, the man is become like one of us, knowing good and evil" (Gen. 3.22). What sort of sin is that, wanting to be like God and to know good and evil? So far is it from being unambiguous, indeed from being sin at all, that countless pious people from that time on would most likely have taken unwillingness to be like God as the original sin...

Bloch on Job's Piety

Job...would never have been so ready [as Abraham] to sacrifice his son. For him, piety was not to be confused with conformity to law and order. (Ernst Bloch, Atheism in Christianity , 19; trans. Swann) Indeed, Job is (or can be) a very radical book, questioning traditional forms of piety, wisdom, and prophetic revelation all as insufficient.

Quote of the Day: Ernst Bloch

I'm reading Ernst Bloch' Atheism in Christianity: The Religion of the Exodus and the Kingdom , probably something I should have read years ago, but, alas, am getting to only now. It is a fascinating read so far, and is a nice counterbalance to the usual scholarly rubbish I have to wade through. There is only this point, that Church and Bible are not one and the same. The Bible has always been the Church's bad conscience. Tolstoy, speaking against her, called not on Haeckel but on the words of Jesus. The Enlightenment, therefore, will be all the more radical when it does not pour equal scorn on the Bible's all-pervading, healthy insight into man. It is for this very reason (one not remote from the Enlightenment) that the Bible can speak to all men, and be understood across so many lands and right on through the ages. (Ernst Block, Atheism in Christianity , 9-10; trans. J.T. Swann)